Non-sequitur: Difference between revisions

From docs.reasonspace.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tag: Manual revert
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
Here are some examples of non-sequiturs.
Here are some examples of non-sequiturs.


{{MAp|https://app.reasonspace.com/arguments/35d1e52577044b138ef928ac79749a41}}
{{Map|https://app.reasonspace.com/arguments/35d1e52577044b138ef928ac79749a41}}


{{Map|https://app.reasonspace.com/maps/3c6b4d76-04ff-4219-8a2e-3e7b7c468e40}}
{{Map|https://app.reasonspace.com/maps/3c6b4d76-04ff-4219-8a2e-3e7b7c468e40}}


{{Map|https://app.reasonspace.com/arguments/4efb15d472cb439d919b18d63f3bfe1e}}
{{Map|https://app.reasonspace.com/arguments/4efb15d472cb439d919b18d63f3bfe1e}}
{{Map|https://app.reasonspace.com/assessments/b4dc6bed90a84c3e9dee243f55f742d6/summary}}

Latest revision as of 13:54, 28 August 2024

A non-sequitur is an inference in which the premises, even if true, offer no support at all for the conclusion.

Here are some examples of non-sequiturs.

export?options%5Bembed%5D=true&options%5Bformat%5D=.png

export?options%5Bembed%5D=true&options%5Bformat%5D=.png

export?options%5Bembed%5D=true&options%5Bformat%5D=.png

export?options%5Bembed%5D=true&options%5Bformat%5D=.png